Soft Sector Controller

Discuss construction, troubleshooting, and operation of the Altair 8800c computer
Post Reply
AltairClone
Site Admin
Posts: 677
Joined: April 5th, 2013, 10:55 am
Contact:

Soft Sector Controller

Post by AltairClone »

I’m toying with the idea of adding two new drive types to the Altair FDC+. Operation of the Pertec FD3712 and its S-100 interface board could be duplicated with the FDC+ and 8” drives like the Shugart SA-800. This would allow support of the IBM standard SSSD 8” soft sector format on your Altair. Likewise, operation of the FD3812 and its interface board could be duplicated to provide support of the IBM System 34 double density format.

Existing FD3712 and FD3812 software (e.g., CP/M) could be run with these new drive types if the FDC+ is strapped to the I/O address used with the FD3x12 (C0h). Unfortunately, selecting this address would require a couple of minor board cuts/jumpers to the FDC+. Alternatively, a couple of minor patches to software would allow existing FD3x12 software to use the default address of the FDC+ (08h) instead.

Thoughts?

Mike
toml_12953
Posts: 305
Joined: June 7th, 2013, 12:54 pm
Contact:

Re: Soft Sector Controller

Post by toml_12953 »

AltairClone wrote:I’m toying with the idea of adding two new drive types to the Altair FDC+. Operation of the Pertec FD3712 and its S-100 interface board could be duplicated with the FDC+ and 8” drives like the Shugart SA-800. This would allow support of the IBM standard SSSD 8” soft sector format on your Altair. Likewise, operation of the FD3812 and its interface board could be duplicated to provide support of the IBM System 34 double density format.

Existing FD3712 and FD3812 software (e.g., CP/M) could be run with these new drive types if the FDC+ is strapped to the I/O address used with the FD3x12 (C0h). Unfortunately, selecting this address would require a couple of minor board cuts/jumpers to the FDC+. Alternatively, a couple of minor patches to software would allow existing FD3x12 software to use the default address of the FDC+ (08h) instead.

Thoughts?

Mike
If you could have a DIP switch select the I/O address, that would be ideal.
AltairClone
Site Admin
Posts: 677
Joined: April 5th, 2013, 10:55 am
Contact:

Re: Soft Sector Controller

Post by AltairClone »

toml_12953 wrote:If you could have a DIP switch select the I/O address, that would be ideal.
Hmmm, just make everyone who wants to try this feature buy a new board? Personally, I'd prefer the no-cost way of doing it :)

Mike
toml_12953
Posts: 305
Joined: June 7th, 2013, 12:54 pm
Contact:

Re: Soft Sector Controller

Post by toml_12953 »

AltairClone wrote:
toml_12953 wrote:If you could have a DIP switch select the I/O address, that would be ideal.
Hmmm, just make everyone who wants to try this feature buy a new board? Personally, I'd prefer the no-cost way of doing it :)

Mike
No one would need to buy a new board since trace cutting and software modification would still be available for anyone not buying one.
However, changing the software seems to defeat the purpose of using the standard formats.

For new users or those of us who switch configurations regularly, a DIP would be a great way not to have to buy a second board to modify and
swap boards when we wanted to run the soft sectored disks. Either way, I'll be buying a second board but the physical swap will be hard on the connectors.
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 1 guest